238 N.J. Super. 367 - State v. Misik’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2 district · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3144 (Bail Reform Act of 1984)
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Addington v. Texas · Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. Written notice of the allegations upon which the state relied for its claim of a right to require a recognizance or detention and of the time and place of the hearing on those allegations; 2. Disclosure at a hearing of the evidence in support of the state’s claim; 3. An opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence; 4. To the effect that it is practicable, the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses; 5. A hearing before a magistrate or other judicial officer; and 6. A written statement by the decision-maker as to the evidence relied upon and the reasons for any adverse decision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.