Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 238 N.W.2d 331 - Braverman v. Eicher

Braverman v. Eicher’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
September 1993
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 1993

8 state decisions

50197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 64 Cal. 2d 396 - Keys v. Romley · Holden v. Construction MacHinery Company · FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN LENOX v. Brown · Holi-Rest, Inc. v. Treloar · Schlotfelt v. VINTON FARMERS'SUPPLY COMPANY

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There has been adopted and developed in this jurisdiction what may best be characterized as a modified civil law rule which recognizes a servitude of natural drainage as between adjoining lands. Under this concept a servient estate must accept surface waters which drain thereon from a dominant estate. On the other hand, no right exists to alter the natural system of drainage from a dominant estate in such manner as to substantially increase the servient estate burden.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Blink v. McNabb
  2. “`[w]herever a situation exists which is contrary to the principles of equity and which can be redressed within the scope of judicial action, a court of equity will devise a remedy to meet the situation, though no similar relief has been given before.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Blink v. McNabb

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.