Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 238 NW2D 647 - Cranston v. Winters

Cranston v. Winters’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
3
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably Farmers Cooperative Ass'n of Churchs Ferry v. Cole (1976), Powell v. American Charter Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (1994)

24 state decisions

90197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boggs v. Merced Mining Co. · Woodland v. Woodland · In Re Kaspari's Estate · Schlichenmayer v. Luithle · Sorenson v. Olson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" first, that the party making the admission by his declaration or conduct was apprised of the true state of his own title; second, that he made the admission with the express intention to deceive, or with such careless and culpable negligence as to amount to constructive fraud; third, that the other party was not only destitute of all knowledge of the true state of the title, but of the means of acquiring such knowledge; and, fourth, that he relied directly upon such admission, and will be injured by allowing its truth to be disproved."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““We cannot expect this farm wife, inexperienced in business and unfamiliar with probate and real estate law, to know the true state of the title to land, when none of the lawyers or the county judge concerned with the probate sale knew the title’s true state.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]e note the fundamental fact that title to joint-tenancy property in this State vests immediately in a surviving joint tenant upon the death of the other joint tenant. It passes to the survivor by right of survivorship and not by the will.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.