238 N.Y. 611
Decided June 6, 1924
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1924-06-06
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1927
1 state decisions
Relies on Burns Manufacturing Co. v. . Clinchfield Products Corp.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1924-06-06
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 Appeal dismissed, with costs, on ground that the Appellate Division having unanimously reinstated the verdict leave to appeal was necessary (Burns Mfg. Co. v. Clinchfield Products Corp., 231 N. Y. 561); no opinion.
¶2 Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.