238 S.W. 922
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided March 22, 1922
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1922-03-22
<p>Criminal law <&wkey;l 144(16) — All presumptions in favor of verdict in absence of statement of facts or bill of exceptions.</p> <p>Where the record contains no statement of facts or bills of exceptions, and the proceedings appear to be regular, all presumptions must be indulged in favor of the correctness of the verdict.</p>
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1926
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1922-03-22
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Conviction is for robbery. Punishment five years in the penitentiary.
¶2The record before us contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. The indictment charges an offense, and the proceedings appear to be regular. In this state of the record all presumption must be indulged in favor of the correctness of the verdict
¶3The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.