Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 238 SW 956 - Findlay v. State

Findlay v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1921

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
February 1982
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 1982

12 state decisions

301921193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hanrick v. Gurley · Maddox Bros. & Anderson v. Fenner · Stafford v. King · Smith v. Fly · Sellman v. Sellman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Such intention will be indicated, not by what the surveyor intended to do and thought he had done, but by what, in fact, he did do. In other words, where did he actually locate the lines and corners' of the survey made by him ? And not simply where did he intend to locate the same with reference 'to some other survey ? This is to be done by ascertaining as best we can, which of the contradictory calls was inserted by mistake, and by rejecting such mistaken call.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Whether or not it ought to be presumed that a surveyor ran out an unmarked prairie line called for in his field notes, and thus ascertained its location upon the ground will depend upon the proximity of marked corners or lines from which such line could have been run. If they were near by and could have ■ been ascertained with certainty, it is reasonable to presume that he ran out such prairie line.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.