State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently July 2021
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sandstrom v. Montana · State v. Lingar · State v. Carson · State v. Erwin · State Ex Rel. DePaul Health Center v. Mummert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Taylor argues that, despite the absence of venue as an element of the crime in section 566.080.1, the inclusion of venue as an element under Missouri Approved Instruction 320.01 — which this Court approved — is presumptively correct. When an approved instruction conflicts with a statute, however, the statute prevails. Insofar as the MAI-CR 320.01 makes venue an element of the offense of rape, it is incorrect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Wolfe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.