Painter v. Simmons’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “In both Brown and Barnes , [the Court] relied on the rationale of Bountiful Brick Co. v. Giles, 276 U.S. 154 , 48 S.Ct. 221 , 72 L.Ed. 507 (1928), to determine whether the accidents arose out of and in the course of the employment. [There] ..., the United States Supreme Court stated that [An employee's] employment includes not only the actual doing of the work, but a reasonable margin of time and space necessary to be used in passing to and from the place where the work is to be done. If the employee be injured while passing, with the express or implied consent of the employer, to or from his work by a way over the employer's premises, or over those of another in such proximity and relation as to be in practical effect a part of the employer's premises, the injury is one arising out of and in the course of the employment as much as though it had happened while the employee was engaged in his work at the place of its performance. In other words, the employment may begin in point of time before the work is entered upon and in point of space before the place where the work is to be done is reached.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 43 Va. App. 514 - Cleveland v. FOOD LION, LLC 0578