¶1*564The appellant demanded a hearing with respect to the reasonableness of the Law Guardian’s fees. Under the circumstances of this case, that issue cannot be determined without a hearing (see, e.g., Kelly v Kelly, 223 AD2d 625). However, since the appellant failed to make any financial disclosure to the court, she was properly denied a hearing as to her ability to pay (see, Miller-Glass v Glass, 237 AD2d 723; Mockler v Mockler, 205 AD2d 510).
¶2We decline to review the question of whether the appellant was properly directed to turn over her medical records, since that relief was granted in prior orders from which no appeal was taken (see, Damen v North Shore Univ. Hosp., 234 AD2d 255; Haibi v Haibi, 171 AD2d 842) or from which the appeal taken by the appellant was dismissed for failure to prosecute (see, Bray v Cox, 38 NY2d 350, 355).
¶3We find no merit to the appellant’s remaining contention. O’Brien, J. P., Goldstein, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.