Halas v. Platek’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2024
2 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 350 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Celotex Corporation v. Edwards · Durfee v. Duke · Pacor Inc. v. Higgins · Holtkamp v. Littlefield
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Congress intended to establish a comprehensive enforcement mechanism for violations of the automatic stay ... within the bankruptcy code itself.”); Sermersheim v. Sermersheim (In re Sermersheim), 97 B.R. 885, 888 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 1989) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The resolution of certain legal issues which arise in the course of bankruptcy cases is confined to the bankruptcy courts.”); In re Raboin, 135 B.R. 682, 684 (Bankr. D.Kan.1991) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.