In Re Rogers’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2018
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157 · 28 U.S.C. § 586 (§ 224 of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 (Title 11))
Relies on Sonnax Industries, Inc. v. Tri Component Products Corp. · In Re Elmira Litho, Inc. · In Re Keene Corp. · In Re Olick · In Re Kowalsky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) Before or at the time of each payment to creditors under the plan, there shall be paid— (1) any unpaid claim of the kind specified in section 507(a)(1) of this title ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Moses
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.