Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

239 Conn. 950

State v. Garvin

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 4, 1996

Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1996-12-04

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2025

4 state decisions

Relies on State v. Garvin

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-12-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 43 Conn. App. 142 (AC 15092), is granted, limited to the following issues:

¶2“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant’s conviction for two counts of failure to appear arising from a single act did not violate the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy?

¶3“2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant’s due process rights were not violated by the enforcement of an illusory plea agreement with the sentencing court?”

*951Decided December 4, 1996Donald D. Dakers, special public defender, in support of the petition.Paul J. Ferencek, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
/239/conn/950 · .json · Public domain