Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 F.1d 188 - Martin v. Matson Nav. Co.

Martin v. Matson Nav. Co.’s Empirical Analysis

239 F. 188 · 1917

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
April 1953
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Cockrell · Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. Thompson · Wecker v. National Enameling & Stamping Co. · Illinois Central Railroad v. Sheegog · Louisville Co v. Wangelin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““employed by said Standard Boiler Works in making said repairs on said steamship Hyades, * * * and while ho was engaged in putting certain bolts in the base of the engine in saidi steamship Hyades, * * * and had crawled down underneath the engines, condenser, and hotwell, a device employed in condensing steam into water for use in the boilers of said steamship Hyades, and while so employed, the defendant Miles R. Clarke, negligently and carelessly opened the valve controlling the flow of water in said hotwell and condenser in such a manner as to cause the same to overflow and flood the place where the said William Brown was engaged at his work, * * * and horribly bum and scald the body of said William Brown in such a manner that as the result thereof said William Brown died on the 5th day of March, 1916, at Seattle, Washington.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.