In re Crisp’s Empirical Analysis
239 F. 419 · 1917
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 1968
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Jones · Buck v. Felder · In re Matthews
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is furthermore clear that the provisions of sections 58a and 59g of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended by sections 9% and 10 of the Act of June 25, 1910, c. 412, 36 Stat. 838 [11 USCA §§ 94(a), 95(g)], that no application for the dismissal of a voluntary or involuntary petition shall be entertained until ten days notice has been sent to creditors of the proposed dismissal, when read together, relate only to dismissals upon application of a party in interest, and do not apply to the dismissal of a voluntary petition, upon the initiation of the court, and for the protection of its officers from the continuance of merely futile proceedings, on account of the bankrupt’s own failure to take the preliminary steps necessary to bring the creditors before the court.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Zimmerman v. Eden
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.