Doyle v. Mitchell Bros.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1917.)

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1917-02-16

<p>On motion for rehearing.</p>

Relies on Von Baumbach v. Sargent Land Co. · Mitchell Bros. v. Doyle · Doyle v. Mitchell Bros.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Denied · Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1917-02-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1965

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1On motion for rehearing.

¶2Denied.

¶3For opinion on appeal, see 235 Fed. 686, - C. C. A. -. See, also, 225 Fed. 437.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5We have held the application for rehearing in the expectation that the decision of the Supreme Court in Von Baumbach v. Sargent, 242 U. S. 503, 37 Sup. Ct. 201, 61 L. Ed. -, might affect the reasoning or the conclusions of our opinion in this case. The opinion in that case was announced on January 15, 1917. It does not consider .those features of the case that are here involved, and so does not add to the existing knowledge on those subjects.

¶6The merits of the petition have been considered, and we are not convinced that there was any substantial error in the opinion.

¶7The petition is denied.