Arthur T. Stanton v. Everett P. Larsh’s Empirical Analysis
239 F.2d 104 · 1957
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Swerdloff v. Miami National Bank (1978), Perez v. Wells Fargo N.A. (2014)
20 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bass v. Hoagland · Knudsen v. Green · Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hare, Et Vir.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings, where no matters outside the pleadings are presented, the fact allegations of the complaint are to be taken as true, but those of the answer are taken as true only where and to the extent that they have not been denied or do not conflict with those of the complaint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.