Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 F.2d 310 - Abbott v. United States

Abbott v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

239 F.2d 310 · 1956

Citation profile

90
cited by 90 later decisions
January 2000
most recently cited

77 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently January 2000 · most notably Perry O. Hooper, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Consolidated American Industries, Inc. v. Mountain States Securities Corporation (1960), Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Company. Federal Trade Commission v. The Superior Oil Company, Inc., a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Exxon Corporation, a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Shell Oil Company, a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Company of California, a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Mobil Oil Corporation, a Corporation (1977)

77 federal appellate · 3 district ·

340195619601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 2311 (Anti Car Theft Act of 1992) · 18 U.S.C. § 2314

Relies on Kann v. United States · Sweet v. United States · Weiss v. United States · Indian Towing Co. v. United States · Shushan v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as old as falsehood and as versable as human ingenuity.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The very requirement of a $5,000 value points towards a Congressional purpose carefully to limit the Federal sanction in theft of non-ambulatory things to those having a substantial worth.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The statute forbids the use of the mails as a means of consummating frauds, and if the mail is used in its actual execution, it matters not whether it was intended or anticipated.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.