Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 F.2d 547 - E. L. Farmer & Company, a Corporation v. Marshall W. Hooks and American Motorists Insurance Company

E. L. Farmer & Company, a Corporation v. Marshall W. Hooks and American Motorists Insurance Company’s Empirical Analysis

239 F.2d 547 · 1957

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
5
states following
April 1984
most recently cited

47 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently April 1984 · most notably Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. (1981), Barnes v. Smith (1962)

47 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

2301957196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stein v. People of State of New York Wissner · Clark v. United States · McDonald v. Pless · Hyde v. United States · Hyde v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . But here both appellant and appellee were on the premises as invitees of Kerr-McGee. Appellee was not there pursuant to direction, consent, or other permissive grant of appellant. There was no relationship of licensor and licensee between them in respect to the occupancy of the premises. And there was nothing in the relationship between them which operated to narrow or limit any extent the duty resting upon appellant to exercise reasonable care under the circumstances for the safety of appellee while they were on the premises of their common employer in connection with the discharge of their respective duties. . . .” (p. 551.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.