Mitchell v. McCarty’s Empirical Analysis
239 F.2d 721 · 1957
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently May 2009 · most notably The American Securit Company, a Corporation v. Hamilton Glass Company, Inc., a Corporation (1958), John T. Dunlop, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. The State of New Jersey (1975)
14 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 203
Relies on United States v. Silk · Rutherford Food Corp. v. McComb · Kennedy v. Silas Mason Co. · Walling US v. General Industries Co · Fountain v. Filson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * It follows that issues of fact raised by pleadings and affidavits in a summary judgment proceeding may not be tried on the basis of affidavits. Campana Corporation v. Harrison, 7 Cir., 135 F.2d 334, 335 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.