Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 F.2d 806 - Archawski v. Hanioti

Archawski v. Hanioti’s Empirical Analysis

239 F.2d 806 · 1956

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
May 1992
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 1992

6 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

7019561960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2007

Relies on Diaz v. United States · United States v. Rosenberg · Archawski v. Hanioti · Bass v. Hoagland · Aero Services, Inc. v. Quinn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under the law of New York, one who enters into a contract without disclosing a known condition of insolvency does not thereby become chargeable with fraud.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.