Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 F.2d 953 - Dermot A. Nee and Antoinette K. Nee v. Joseph v. Dillon and Lois B. Dillon

Dermot A. Nee and Antoinette K. Nee v. Joseph v. Dillon and Lois B. Dillon’s Empirical Analysis

239 F.2d 953 · 1956

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
4
states following
May 1989
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 district · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently May 1989 · most notably Frost v. PEOPLES DRUG STORE, INCORPORATED (1974), Carr v. Bio-Medical Applications of Washington, Inc. (1976)

1 federal appellate · 4 district · 25 state decisions

1401956196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Glendale Corp. v. Crawford · Gross v. Owen · Brodsky v. Hull · Younis v. Hart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a situation of this sort we think the District Court should make inquiry at pre-trial or at the trial itself with respect to the reasons why the doctrine of forum non conveniens should not be applied, even though jurisdiction in the strict sense can be obtained here under established rules. Cf. Gross v. Owen, 1955, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 222 , 221 F.2d 94 . In matters of this kind, plaintiffs from other jurisdictions should normally resort to their own courts: the courts of the District of Columbia, burdened as they are, should not without good reason be asked to make inquiry concerning events happening outside their jurisdiction or enter decrees with respect to property located elsewhere.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.