Charles Crissman’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Paul v. Davis · Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. · Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If we were dealing with the exercise by [the utility] of some power delegated to it by the State which is traditionally associated with sovereignty .... our case would be quite a different one.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Crissman“enforce the [Harness Racing] Act and the rules and orders of the Commission.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Crissman“overall involvement of the State in the affairs of the private entity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Crissman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.