Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 F.3d 596 - Julie Welker v. Darrell L. Clarke

Julie Welker v. Darrell L. Clarke’s Empirical Analysis

239 F.3d 596 · 2001

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hennings v. Grafton · Curry v. Baker · Pettengill v. Putnam County R-1 School District, Unionville, Missouri · Swartley v. Harris · Gold v. Feinberg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To achieve this purpose, the NVRA strictly limited removal of voters based on change of address and instead required that, for federal elections, states maintain accurate registration rolls by using reliable information from government agencies such as the Postal Service's change of address records. The NVRA went even further by also requiring the implementation of "fail-safe” voting procedures to ensure voters would not be removed from registration rolls due to clerical errors or the voter's own failure to re-register at a new address.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “fail-safe” voting procedures to ensure voters would not be removed from registration rolls due to clerical errors or the voter's own failure to re-register at a new address. Id. at 599 (citing 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg-6(b)(1)). 18 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.