239 F. App'x 71 - White v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

cited by 1 later decisions

July 2018

most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Greenspan v. Shalala · Leggett v. Chater · Johnson v. Bowen · Fraga v. Bowen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“Use of the 'Grid Rules' is appropriate when it is established that a claimant suffers only from exertional impairments, or that the claimant's nonexertional impairments do not significantly affect his residual functional capacity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Herrmann v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
“The mere existence of pain does not prohibit reliance on the Grid Rules where the ALJ finds that the pain will not significantly compromise a claimant's capacity for a full range of work.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Herrmann v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
“[a]n ALJ's finding of a severe non-exertional impairment at step two precludes the ALJ from relying solely on the Grid Rules at step five.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Herrmann v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.