¶1 Marlow Smith argues that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction of misdemeanor possession of cocaine base. Smith argues that the evidence merely shows that he was present at a known crack house when authorities executed a search warrant and that it fails to establish that he actually or constructively possessed cocaine base found in the house. Our review of the evidence shows that a rational juror could have concluded that Smith constructively possessed cocaine base by exercising control over rocks of cocaine base found during the execution of the search warrant. United States v. Ornelas-Rodriguez, 12 F.3d 1339, 1346 (5th Cir.1994); United States v. Jaramillo, 42 F.3d 920, 923 (5th Cir.1995). We will not disturb that determination. United States v. Runyan, 290 F.3d 223, 240 (5th Cir.2002).
¶2 AFFIRMED.