Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 FSUPP2D 102 - Freeport Transit, Inc. v. McNulty

Freeport Transit, Inc. v. McNulty’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
April 2005
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Hishon v. King & Spalding · Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. · Neder v. United States · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.