Lasar v. Ford Motor Co.’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1927
Relies on United States v. United Mine Workers of America · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · State v. Simpson · Fink v. Gomez · United States v. Powers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“necessary to reimburse Lasar and the Court [and] ... to vindicate the Court's authority and to ensure that Ford, through its lawyers, will not disregard or attempt to circumvent court orders in this or any other case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“no longer be allowed to represent Ford in this case or any other case in the Missoula Division of the Montana Federal District Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“met up with some of his friends and spent the day playing pool, visiting some local establishments”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.