Boadi v. Center for Human Development, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 2601 (§ 2 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2611 (§ 101 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2612 (§ 102 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2614 (§ 104 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2615 (§ 105 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 42 U.S.C. § 12102 (§ 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Plaintiff has the initial burden to establish a prima facie case under this framework. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. , 411 U.S. at 802 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 . "The rather minimal showing functions to raise an inference of discrimination." Moebius , 2016 WL 6476941 , at (citing Tex. Dep't of Cmty. Affairs v. Burdine , 450 U.S. 248 , 253-54, 101 S.Ct. 1089 , 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981) ). If Plaintiff establishes the inference, the burden shifts to Defendant[ ] "to articulate a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its action." Ramos-Echevarría v. Pichis, Inc. , 659 F.3d 182 , 186-87 (1st Cir. 2011) (citing Freadman v. Metro. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. , 484 F.3d 91 , 99 (1st Cir. 2007) ); see also McDonnell Douglas Corp. , 411 U.S. at 802 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 . "If the employer offers a non-discriminatory reason, the burden then shifts back to the plaintiff to show that the employer's justification is mere pretext cloaking discriminatory animus." Ramos-Echevarría , 659 F.3d at 187 (citing Freadman , 484 F.3d at 99 ).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“three-stage burden shifting framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green , 411 U.S. 792 , 802-05, 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“No covered entity shall discriminate against a qualified individual on the basis of disability in regard to job application procedures, the hiring, advancement, or discharge of employees, employee compensation, job training, and other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.