Mumin v. Uber Technologies, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 102 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 157 (§ 7 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahon · Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[N]o matter how broad the arbitration clause, it may be necessary to file an action in court to enforce an arbitration agreement, or to obtain a judgment enforcing an arbitration award, and the parties may need to invoke the jurisdiction of a court to obtain other remedies. It is apparent that the venue provision here was intended for these purposes, and to identify the venue for any other claims that were not covered by the arbitration agreement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.