Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 Ga. 636 - Estes v. Perkins

Estes v. Perkins’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
February 2013
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2013

6 state decisions

3019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boland v. Aycock · Oxford v. Oxford · Akin v. Patton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The relative wealth or financial condition of beneficiaries may generally be proved for the purpose of emphasizing the reasonableness or unnaturalness of the testamentary disposition and determining whether undue influence was exercised over the testator at the time of its execution...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.