Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

239 Ga. 67

235 S.E.2d 519

Moore v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 13, 1977

Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1977-05-13

Cited by 16 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1989

12 federal appellate ·

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“a mistaken belief that such sentence would never be upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court,” and (2) the court, in deciding to impose the death penalty, had relied on information (contained in the probation officer's presentence report) which Moore”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Moore v. Kemp

Relies on Meeks v. Havener · Moore v. State · West Point Pepperell, Inc. v. Springfield

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1977-05-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Undercofler, Presiding Justice.

¶1 Appellant was sentenced to death on July 17, 1974, following guilty pleas to charges of murder and armed *68 robbery. This court affirmed. Moore v. State, 233 Ga. 861 (213 SE2d 829) (1975), cert. den. 428 U. S. 910 (1976).

Argued April 11, 1977 Decided May 13, 1977 Rehearing denied May 26, 1977. Pierce & House, Hinton R. Pierce, for appellant. H. Reginald Thompson, District Attorney, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, for appellee.

¶2 This appeal is from the denial of a petition and motion to grant appellant a new trial on the issue of sentence by virtue of the court’s general equitable powers and authority to enter declaratory judgments. Appellant argues that at the time of his death sentence the trial judge may not have imposed it except for a mistaken belief that such sentence would never be upheld by the U. S. Supreme Court. We affirm. Petitions and motions of the nature presented here are not maintainable.

¶3 "Our existing post conviction relief procedures are available to provide justice.” Ross v. State, 238 Ga. 445 (233 SE2d 381) (1977); Smith v. State, 238 Ga. 655 (1977).

¶4 Ancillary to the case under review appellant has filed in this court a motion to order the trial court to hold a hearing to determine whether or not the trial judge imposed the death sentence, at least in part, on the basis of information which the appellant has no opportunity to deny or explain. See Gardner v. Florida, — U. S. — (97 SC 1197, 51 LE2d 393) (1977). As stated above our existing post conviction proceedings are available to provide justice. The motion in this court is denied without prejudice.

¶5 Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.
/239/ga/67 · .json · Public domain