Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 Ga. App. 524 - Inglett v. State

239 Ga. App. 524 - Inglett v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
5
states following
November 2019
most recently cited

31 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Maryland v. Buie · Johnson v. State · 230 Ga. App. 159 - Pollard v. State · 227 Ga. App. 870 - Kovacs v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Police officers are authorized to make a protective sweep in conjunction with an in-home arrest when they possess “articulable facts which, taken together with the rational inferences from those facts, would warrant a reasonably prudent officer in believing that the area to be swept harbors an individual posing a danger to those on the arrest scene.” Maryland v. Buie, 494 U. S. 325, 334 (110 SC 1093,108 LE2d 276) (1990). It would thus appear that the officers in this case had the grounds needed to justify a protective sweep. And even if they did not, exigent circumstances did permit a cursory search of the house in order to prevent the escape of unknown individuals. See United States v. Rubin, 474 F2d 262, 268-269 (3), (4) (3rd Cir. 1973).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.