Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 Ill. App. 3d 844 - Ali v. Jones

239 Ill. App. 3d 844 - Ali v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 2021

16 state decisions

701993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 131 Ill. 2d 328 - People v. R.G. · 179 Ill. App. 3d 611 - In Re Marriage of Santa Cruz · 9 Ill. App. 3d 951 - Bender v. Schallerer · 79 Ill. App. 3d 991 - Francone v. Weigel Broadcasting Co. · 200 Ill. App. 3d 982 - Firkus v. Firkus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(2) Notice of Withdrawal. An attorney may not withdraw his appearance for a party without leave of court and notice to all parties of record, and, unless another attorney is substituted, he must give reasonable notice of the time and place of the presentation of the motion for leave to withdraw ***. Such notice shall advise said party that to insure notice of any action in said cause, he should retain other counsel therein or file with the clerk of the court, within 21 days after entry of the order of withdrawal, his supplementary appearance stating therein an address at which service *** may be had upon him. (3) *** The motion [to withdraw] may be denied by the court if the granting of it would delay the trial of the case, or would otherwise be inequitable.” (Emphasis added.) 134 Ill. 2d Rules 13(c)(2), (c)(3).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “given the 21-day transition period that Rule 13 contemplates for the continuation of representation, the trial court should have allowed the plaintiff's continuance”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.