Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 Ind. 673 - Dobson v. State

Dobson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
December 1983
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 1983

18 state decisions

601959196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wertheimer & Goldberg v. State · Breedlove v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The question of- whether the accused had knowledge or reason to infer’ that the goods were stolen is a matter for the judge or jury to determine in light of all the facts and circumstances surrounding the receipt or purchase. 76 C. J. S. Receiving Stolen Goods §20, p. 50. This court has repeatedly held that knowledge on the part of the accused that the property received was stolen may be proved or inferred from the circumstances....””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.