State v. Nioce’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2008
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1151 (Indian Crimes Act of 1976) · 18 U.S.C. § 1153 · 18 U.S.C. § 3243
Relies on Youngbear v. Brewer · 415 F. Supp. 807 - Youngbear v. Brewer · State v. Mitchell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Jurisdiction is conferred on the State of Kansas over offenses committed by or against Indians on Indian reservations, including trust or restricted allotments, within the State of Kansas, to the same extent as its courts have jurisdiction over offenses committed elsewhere within the State in accordance with the laws of the State. “This section shall not deprive the courts of the United States of jurisdiction over offenses defined by the laws of the United States committed by or against Indians on Indian reservations.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“all crimes committed by or against Indians on Indian reservations located in Kansas.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Negonsott v. Samuels
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.