State v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 2 Kan. App. 2d 603 - State v. Daniels · Goetz v. Hand · In Re Habeas Corpus Application of Gilchrist · Selbe v. Hudspeth · 5 Kan. App. 2d 678 - State v. Andrews
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In Selbe v. Hudspeth, 175 Kan. 154, 157 , 259 P.2d 204 (1953), the court stated that the purpose of K.S.A. 62-1304 (Corrick), a similar statue, was to provide for a record that disclosed fully what had occurred, so that there could be no controversy as to what advice was given to the accused by the court and his responses and answers to any questions asked him or as to whether the trial court made the findings requisite under the statute. “In Goetz v. Hand, 185 Kan. [788,] 793, [ 347 P.2d 349 (1959),] this court stated that the judgment record is prima facie evidence of the facts which it recites. Where a question of waiver of the right to counsel arises, the Kansas decisions simply hold that there must be some written evidence in the record to show that the defendant was fully advised as to his right to appointed counsel.” 239 Kan. at 367 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Armstrong
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.