Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 La. 259 - State v. Christine

State v. Christine’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
5
states following
June 1987
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently June 1987 · most notably 495 So. 2d 1306 - State v. Griffin (1986), City of College Park v. Cotter (1987)

31 state decisions

210196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roth v. United States · United States v. Harriss · United States v. Petrillo · Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United States · Nash v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. . . a public place within the ordinance, and as applied to an enclosure, room or building, must be considered as one wherein, by general invitation, members of the public attend for reasons of business, entertainment, instruction or the like, and are welcome so long as they conform to what is customarily there done . . .. An eating house is a public place . . . and a restaurant is an eating house under another name. It is within this definition that a church is a public place . . . and so a barber shop.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Obscenity is the intentional: «* * * “(3) Performance by any person * * * in any public place or in any public manner, of any act of lewdness or indecency, grossly scandalous and tending to debauch the morals and manners of the people; •« h= h< * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “as the term was used in a city ordinance, making it a crime for any person to profanely swear or curse or use vulgar or indecent language in any public place within the city:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.