Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 La. 749 - Roy v. Florane

Roy v. Florane’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 1992
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 1992

8 state decisions

401960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Decuers v. Bourdet · 18 La. App. 387 - Wardlaw v. Conrad · Cotton v. Washburn · Ricketts v. Duble · McCormick v. Monette

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"No matter what may have been the cause for divorce, excepting mutual consent, the husband or wife against whom it shall have been granted, shall lose all the advantages which the other party shall have made to him or her, whether by marriage contract or since the marriage."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"Article 156 of the LSA-Civil Code is consistent with the articles of [the Code Napoleon] providing for revocation of donations in consideration of marriage for cause of ingratitude."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"In case of separation, any donation which the husband or wife may have made the one to the other, in consideration of their marriage, shall be void and without effect, ...."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.