Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 La. 951 - Stassi v. Gureasko

Stassi v. Gureasko’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2009

6 state decisions

2019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Potts · City of Shreveport v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. · City of Orlando v. Murphy · Hoey v. New Orleans Great Northern R. Co. · City of Shreveport v. Kansas City, S. & G. Ry. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When an appellate court renders a final judgment on the merits of a case, disposing of all of the issues tendered, and remands the case to the trial court for the purpose merely of having a certain calculation made, or of having certain specified facts ascertained, and with instructions to the trial court to render judgment according to the opinion rendered by the appellate court, the merits of the case are not subject to review or reconsideration by means of another appeal.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.