Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 Md. 342 - Burley v. State

Burley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
May 2008
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2008

19 state decisions

6019651970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State · Washington, Baltimore & Annapolis Electric Railroad v. Kimmey · Hanley v. Stulman · Colter v. State · Burley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We recognized an exception to the general rule where the trial court refused even to consider newly discovered evidence relating to a motion for a new trial. Wash., B. & A.R. Co. v. Kimmey, 141 Md. 243 [ 118 A. 648 ]. The instant case comes within the purview of the general rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.