Mauldin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2001
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rochin v. People of California · Breithaupt v. Abram · Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles · Lee v. State · Walton v. City of Roanoke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The applicable statute, Sec. 100 of Art. 35 of the Code, makes it plain that affirmative consent to the taking of the test is not a prerequisite to its validity or to the admissibility of its results. Most courts hold that if there is an absence of refusal to submit to the test the failure to affirmatively or validly agree to its taking does not bar the presentation of its results into evidence."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Loscomb“'no person shall be compelled to submit himself * * * for the purpose of chemical analysis * * * and no inference * * * concerning his guilt or innocence arises by reason of his re fusal to submit * * ” The Court went on to state that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.