Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 Md. App. 467 - Baddock v. Baltimore Cnty.

239 Md. App. 467 - Baddock v. Baltimore Cnty.’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on City of New Orleans v. Dukes · United States v. Carolene Products Co. · National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius · National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius · Governor of the State v. Exxon Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen determining whether an ordinance satisfies Article 24 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights, we ask rhetorically whether the legislative enactment, as an exercise of the legislature's police power, bears a real and substantial relation to the public health, morals, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the State or municipality. The rational basis test is highly deferential; it presumes a statute is constitutional and should be struck down only if the reviewing court concludes that the Legislature enacted the statute irrationally or interferes with a fundamental right .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Legislative bodies are permitted to make commercial classifications that distinguish between entities,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.