239 Mich. App. 140 - People v. Henry’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in [the discharge-of-firearm statute] indicates that the Legislature intended the offense to require a specific intent. Rather, the use of the word”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]n the absence of qualifying provisions, the terms `intent' and `intentional' in a criminal statute refer to general criminal intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.