Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 MINN 523 - Miller v. Simons

Miller v. Simons’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
4
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2012

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 11 state decisions

801953196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Giedrewicz v. Donovan · Emery v. Fowler · Shapiro v. McCarthy · Smith v. Smith · American Surety Co. of New York v. Dickson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The doctrine of estoppel by verdict is established in the interest of public policy. There must be an end to litigation sometime. Where a party has litigated an issue in a former action in a court of competent jurisdiction, he should not be permitted to litigate the issue again to the harassment and vexation of his opponent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “... there must be proof of the finality of the adjudication in order to constitute an estoppel and ordinarily a verdict is not such an adjudication since it may be set aside upon a motion for a new trial or upon a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the entry of judgment has been prevented by action of the adverse party or the court in such manner that it would be inequitable not to give to the one entitled thereto the benefit of the bar or estoppel which would attend the judgment when entered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.