Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 Miss. 384 - Jester v. Bailey

Jester v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
February 1988
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently February 1988

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

140196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Planters Wholesale Grocery v. Kincade · Thomas v. Motor Lines · Terry v. Smylie · Buntyn v. Robinson · Rhodes v. Fullilove

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The range-of-vision rule is not an arbitrary rule of thumb to require “infallibility of the nocturnal motorist.” The motorist must keep his car under such control that he can stop within the clear and unobstructed distance ahead of him, but in determining whether he should be held responsible, the character, appearance, and visibility of unlighted vehicles parked on the road must be taken into consideration.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Strictly applied, the rule that a motorist blinded by the lights of approaching cars must either stop or control his car so as to be able to stop in time to avoid collision with any discernible object in the road ahead allows little chance for a motorist who is so blinded and strikes such an object to escape the imputation of negligence. However, it has frequently been recognized that the rule is subject to certain exceptions and qualifications tempering its harshness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.