Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 N.C. 73 - Neal v. Marrone

Neal v. Marrone’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

102
cited by 102 later decisions
2
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 84 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 102 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably 87 N.C. App. 325 - Zinn v. Walker (1987), Fox v. Southern Appliances, Inc. (1965)

2 federal appellate · 84 state decisions

28019531960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Whitehurst v. . Fcx Fruit and Vegetable Service · Brown v. . Hall · Evans v. Freeman. · Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. Morehead · Moffitt v. . Maness

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A contract not required to be in writing may be partly written and partly oral. However, where the parties have deliberately put their engagements in writing in such terms as import a legal obligation free of uncertainty, it is presumed the writing was intended by the parties to represent all their engagements as to the elements dealt with in the writing. Accordingly, all prior and contemporaneous negotiations in respect to those elements are deemed merged in the written agreement. And the rule is that, in the absence of fraud or mistake or allegation thereof, parol testimony of prior or contemporaneous negotiations or conversations inconsistent with the writing, or which tend to substitute a new and different contract from the one evidenced by the writing, is incompetent.”
    22 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.