Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 Neb. 130 - State v. Nowicki

State v. Nowicki’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably Maddux v. Maddux (1991), State v. Jackson (1998)

36 state decisions

2401991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Burgett v. Texas · Baldasar v. Illinois · State v. Irish

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘If when inadmissible evidence is offered the party against whom such evidence is offered consents to its introduction, or fails to object, or to insist upon a ruling on an objection to the introduction of the evidence, and otherwise fails to raise the question as to its admissibility, he is considered to have waived whatever objection he may have had thereto, and the evidence is in the record for consideration the same as other evidence.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The Supreme Court, in reviewing decisions of the district court which affirmed, reversed, or modified decisions of the county court, will consider only those errors specifically assigned in the appeal to the district court and again assigned as error in the appeal to the Supreme Court. This rule shall be effective so as to apply to all county court decisions appealed to the district court after the filing date of this opinion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.