Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 N.J. Super. 201 - Chernow v. Reyes

239 N.J. Super. 201 - Chernow v. Reyes’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 6 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently September 2015

2 federal appellate · 6 district · 14 state decisions

120199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of America · 63 N.J. Super. 517 - United Board & Carton Corp. v. Britting · 174 N.J. Super. 418 - Auxton Computer Enterprises, Inc. v. Parker · 61 N.J. Super. 340 - United Board & Carton Corp. v. Britting · United Board & Carton Corp. v. Britting

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If an agent receives anything as a result of his violation of a duty of loyalty to the principal, he is subject to a liability to deliver it, its value, or its proceeds, to the principal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an agent is subject to a duty not to compete with the principal concerning the subject matter of his agency.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “entitled to solicit customers for such rival business before the end of his employment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.