Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 239 N.J. Super. 33 - State v. Bodtmann

239 N.J. Super. 33 - State v. Bodtmann’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
April 2008
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Arizona v. Hicks · Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe · Williams v. States · State v. Novembrino

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Except as otherwise provided in this act, a person, whether or not a party, has a privilege in a civil action or in a prosecution for a crime or violation of the disorderly persons law or for an act of juvenile delinquency to refuse to disclose, and to prevent a witness from disclosing a communication. .. .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.