Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

239 N.Y. 171

Motion for Re-argument

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1924

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1924-12-19

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1935

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1924-12-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Lehman, J.

¶1I concur in the denial of the motion for a re-argument, but in my opinion the plaintiff may recover only the value of the rubles in his deposit account, regarded for that purpose as a res, whether the action be technically for breach of contract or to enforce a quasi-contractual obligation.

¶2Motion denied.

/239/ny/171 · .json · Public domain